Bulgin v. State; Patel v. State; Pelky v. State

912 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 2005) · Supreme Court of Florida · May 19, 2005 · No. Nos. SC03-2214, SC03-2215, SC03-2217

Summary

The Supreme Court of Florida held that a criminal defendant's agreement to cooperate with law enforcement, standing alone, does not waive the right to a speedy trial or prevent the speedy-trial period from running. The court quashed the First District Court of Appeal's decision and approved the Fifth District's decision in Williams v. State. The court concluded that the State remained responsible for bringing the defendants to trial within the applicable period absent an explicit waiver or another recognized exception.

Holdings

  1. A criminal defendant's agreement to cooperate with police, standing alone, does not waive the right to a speedy trial, make the delay attributable to the defendant, or render the defendant unavailable for trial under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.
  2. Under Florida law, the speedy-trial period begins upon the defendant's initial arrest, even if formal charges are filed later.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a criminal defendant's agreement to cooperate with police, without an express speedy-trial waiver, makes delay attributable to the defendant under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(j)(2).
  2. Whether a defendant who cooperates with police under an agreement postponing formal charges is unavailable for trial under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(j)(3).
  3. Whether the speedy-trial period begins on the defendant's initial arrest even when formal charges are delayed until cooperation is complete.

Disposition

quashed

Cases Cited (23)

  • State v. Bulgin, 858 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)(reversed)
  • Williams v. State, 757 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)(approved)
  • Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967)(followed)
  • Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)(followed)
  • Weed v. State, 411 So. 2d 863 (Fla. 1982)(followed)
  • State v. Naveira, 873 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 2004)(followed)
  • Genden v. Fuller, 648 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 1994)(followed)
  • State v. Agee, 622 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 1993)(followed)
  • State v. Thaddies, 364 So. 2d 819 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Smith v. Nesbitt, 355 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…