In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

102 So. 3d 451 (Fla. 2012) · Supreme Court of Florida · October 18, 2012

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court adopts amendments to Florida court rules requiring mandatory electronic filing of court documents and establishing procedures for maintaining electronic court records. The opinion addresses exemptions for self-represented parties, nonparties, certain paper documents, and oversized filings, and provides a phased implementation schedule for different divisions and courts. It also adopts conforming amendments concerning electronic filing and service in civil, criminal, probate, appellate, and other proceedings.

Holdings

  1. The Court adopted amendments to the Florida rules of court requiring court records to be filed by electronic transmission in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.525, subject to specified exceptions and implementation dates.
  2. Mandatory electronic filing does not apply in specified circumstances, including when the clerk lacks electronic-filing capability, when the filer is self-represented, when the attorney is excused from e-mail service, when filing exhibits or nondocumentary materials, when documents exceed 25 megabytes, when filing occurs in open court, when approved procedures permit paper filing, or when justice so requires.
  3. Documents filed electronically satisfy requirements for filing an original unless a statute or rule requires submission of an original, and the official court file consists principally of electronic documents together with authorized supplemental nonelectronic materials.
  4. The mandatory electronic filing amendments became effective according to a phased schedule for civil, probate, small claims, family law, criminal, traffic, juvenile, appellate, and Supreme Court proceedings, subject to later administrative orders.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Supreme Court of Florida should amend the Florida rules of court to make electronic filing mandatory for court records.
  2. What exceptions should apply to mandatory electronic filing, including for self-represented parties, self-represented nonparties, excused attorneys, exhibits, oversized filings, and documents filed in open court.
  3. How mandatory electronic filing should be implemented across the trial courts, appellate courts, and Supreme Court of Florida.
  4. What conforming amendments were necessary to the civil, criminal, probate, small claims, juvenile, appellate, and family law rules to accommodate electronic filing and electronic court records.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • In re E-mail Service Rule, No. SC10-2101 (Fla. 2012)(followed)
  • In re Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin., 872 So. 2d 449, 463 (Fla. 1979)(followed)
  • Amends. to Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.090—Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents, 681 So. 2d 698, 699 (Fla. 1996)(followed)
  • Amends. to Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.090—Electronic Transmission & Filing of Documents, and Rule 2.060—Attorneys, 701 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1997)(followed)
  • In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin.—Reorganization of the Rules, 939 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 2006)(followed)
  • In re Amendments to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin.—Rule 2.236, 41 So. 3d 128 (Fla. 2010)(followed)
  • In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin.; Fla. Rules of App. Pro., 31 So. 3d 756 (Fla. 2010)(followed)
  • In re Implementation of Comm. on Privacy & Court Records Recommendations—Amends. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Pro.; Fla. Rules of Jud. Admin.; Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro.; Fla. Probate Rules; Fla. Small Claims Rules; Fla. Rules of App. Pro.; Fla. Family Law Rules of Pro., 78 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011)(followed)
  • Miami Transit Co. v. Ford, 155 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1963)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…