Summary
The Florida Supreme Court held that a Palm Bay ordinance granting municipal code-enforcement liens priority over previously recorded mortgages was invalid because it conflicted with Florida’s statutory scheme governing lien priority. The court concluded that municipal home-rule powers do not authorize a municipality to create exceptions to or override controlling state law and answered the certified question in the negative.
Holdings
- A municipality may not enact an ordinance granting its code-enforcement liens priority over prior recorded mortgages when that priority conflicts with Florida's statutory scheme governing the priority of interests in real property.
- The Legislature's creation of exceptions to a statutory scheme does not authorize municipalities to create their own exceptions to that scheme.
Questions Presented
- Whether Article VIII, section 2(b), of the Florida Constitution and sections 166.021 and 162.09, Florida Statutes, authorize a municipality to enact an ordinance granting code-enforcement liens superpriority over prior recorded mortgages.
- Whether Palm Bay's ordinance superpriority provision is invalid because it conflicts with Florida's statutory scheme governing the priority of interests in real property.
Disposition
approved
Cases Cited (7)
- City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 57 So. 3d 226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)(approved)
- City of Palm Bay v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 67 So. 3d 271, 271 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (mem.)(cited)
- City of Hollywood v. Mulligan, 934 So. 2d 1238, 1243 (Fla. 2006)(followed)
- Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So. 2d 252, 254-55 (Fla. 1989)(followed)
- Thomas v. State, 614 So. 2d 468, 470 (Fla. 1993)(followed)
- Argent Mortgage Co., LLC v. Wachovia Bank N.A., 52 So. 3d 796 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)(cited)
- Van Eepoel Real Estate Co. v. Sarasota Milk Co., 100 Fla. 438, 129 So. 892 (1930)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…