Summary
The court granted the Palm Beach Soil and Water Conservation District's motion for summary judgment in an employment discrimination action brought under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. It held that a workers' compensation settlement release barred the plaintiff's discrimination claims and further concluded that Title II of the ADA does not provide a cause of action for employment discrimination.
Holdings
- The broad release in Bledsoe's workers' compensation settlement contractually released the District from the discrimination claims asserted in this action.
- Title II of the ADA does not create a cause of action for employment discrimination.
Questions Presented
- Whether the workers' compensation settlement release barred Bledsoe's ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims.
- Whether Title II of the ADA creates a cause of action for employment discrimination by a public entity.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (44)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 256 (1986)(followed)
- Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)(followed)
- Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 929 F.2d 604, 608 (11th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Barefoot v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 650 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(distinguished)
- F.M. v. Palm Beach County, 912 F. Supp. 514 (S.D. Fla. 1995)(followed)
- F.M. v. County Commissioners, 84 F.3d 438 (11th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- United States v. Cagnina, 697 F.2d 915, 923 (11th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Iskander v. Rodeo Sanitary District, 1995 WL 56578, at *9 (N.D. Cal. 1995)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 44.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…