Michael D. Dyer v. The State

Dyer v. State · Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia · October 1, 2020 · No. A21D0061

Summary

The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed Michael D. Dyer’s discretionary-review application as untimely because it was filed 46 days after the trial court orders he sought to appeal, exceeding the 30-day period under OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The court also held that a motion to set aside a criminal conviction is not an authorized procedure for collaterally attacking a criminal judgment.

Holdings

  1. An application for discretionary review must be filed within 30 days after entry of the order to be appealed; an application filed 46 days after entry is untimely and must be dismissed.
  2. A motion to set aside is not an authorized procedure for collaterally attacking the validity of a criminal judgment; an application or direct appeal presenting only such a motion is subject to dismissal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the application for discretionary review was timely under OCGA § 5-6-35(d).
  2. Whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to review the denial of the motion for an out-of-time appeal when the application was filed 46 days after the challenged orders.
  3. Whether a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 is an authorized procedure for collaterally attacking a criminal judgment of conviction.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (7)

  • Crosson v. Conway, 291 Ga. 220, 220(1), 728 S.E.2d 617 (2012)(followed)
  • Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734, 380 S.E.2d 57 (1989)(followed)
  • English v. State, 307 Ga. App. 544, 545 n.4, 705 S.E.2d 667 (2011)(followed)
  • Lunsford v. State, 237 Ga. App. 696, 696, 515 S.E.2d 198 (1999)(followed)
  • Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582, 582, 420 S.E.2d 393 (1992)(followed)
  • Lacey v. State, 253 Ga. 711, 711, 324 S.E.2d 471 (1985)(followed)
  • Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532, 690 S.E.2d 150 (2010)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…