Summary
The Georgia Court of Appeals granted Southeast Centerline, Inc.’s applications for interlocutory review in three related cases arising from a fatal vehicular accident. Because the trial court had granted partial summary judgment to Patty Howze, the court held that the order was directly appealable and directed Southeast to file a notice of appeal within ten days if it had not already done so.
Holdings
- A trial court's grant of summary judgment on any issue or as to any party is reviewable by direct appeal under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h).
- All rulings within the order granting partial summary judgment, as well as other non-final rulings entered in the case, may be raised as part of the direct appeal.
- Because the trial court granted partial summary judgment, the order was directly appealable and Southeast was not required to file interlocutory applications for review.
Questions Presented
- Whether an order granting partial summary judgment on any issue or as to any party is directly appealable under OCGA § 9-11-56 (h).
- Whether rulings denying an evidentiary motion and a motion for summary judgment may be reviewed in a direct appeal from the same order under OCGA § 5-6-34 (d).
- Whether Southeast was required to file interlocutory applications rather than proceed by direct appeal.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (3)
- Olympic Dev. Group v. American Druggists’ Ins. Co., 175 Ga. App. 425, 425 (1) (333 SE2d 622) (1985)(followed)
- Southeast Ceramics, Inc. v. Klem, 246 Ga. 294, 295 (1) (271 SE2d 199) (1980)(followed)
- Spivey v. Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n. 1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…