Summary
The Georgia Supreme Court affirmed a trial court judgment quieting title to a disputed 1.32-acre tract in favor of the appellee. The court held that the evidence supported adverse possession under both the twenty-year statutory period and the seven-year period under color of title, including public, continuous, exclusive, uninterrupted, and peaceable possession accompanied by a claim of right.
Holdings
- The evidence authorized the trial court to find that the appellee's predecessors maintained public, exclusive, and continuous possession of the disputed tract and thereby satisfied the requirements for adverse possession.
- The evidence authorized the finding that Daughtry's hostile possession was undertaken in good faith and accompanied by a claim of right.
- Remand was not required because the special master's report contained more than sufficient findings of fact.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence established the public, exclusive, continuous, uninterrupted, peaceable, and hostile possession required to acquire title by adverse possession.
- Whether the evidence supported a finding that the predecessor's possession was accompanied by a good-faith claim of right.
- Whether the special master's report contained sufficient findings of fact to support the quiet-title judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Cooley v. McRae, 275 Ga. 435, 436, 569 S.E.2d 845 (2002)(followed)
- Hartwell R. Co. v. Barnes, 276 Ga. 246 (2), 577 S.E.2d 566 (2003)(followed)
- Anderson v. Barron, 208 Ga. 785, 69 S.E.2d 874 (1952)(distinguished)
- McCook v. Crawford, 114 Ga. 337, 40 S.E. 225 (1901)(distinguished)
- Halpern v. The Lacy Investment Corp., 259 Ga. 264 (1), 379 S.E.2d 519 (1989)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…