Summary
The Georgia Supreme Court held that, in valuing a closely held corporation for equitable division of marital property, a court is not bound by the buy-sell price in a shareholder agreement that was not signed by the non-shareholder spouse. The court affirmed the property division based on the stock's fair market value and dismissed the wife's cross-appeal regarding alimony.
Holdings
- A court valuing an ownership interest in a closely held corporation for equitable division of marital property is not bound by the price specified in a buy-sell agreement that was not signed by the non-shareholder spouse. The agreement price may be considered along with other factors in determining value.
- The arbitrator properly valued husband's Triad stock at $508,000 rather than being bound by the $342,200 formula price, and the division of marital property was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether, in valuing stock of a closely held corporation for purposes of dividing marital property in a divorce, the court is bound by the value specified in a buy-sell provision of a shareholder agreement that was not signed by the non-shareholder spouse.
- Whether the superior court erred in adopting the arbitrator's division of marital property based on a fair-market valuation of the stock.
- Whether wife's cross-appeal concerning alimony remained at issue after she withdrew it.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (5)
- Hertz v. Hertz, 657 P2d 1169 (N.M. 1983)(distinguished_from)
- McDiarmid v. McDiarmid, 649 A2d 810 (D.C. 1994)(distinguished_from)
- Cole v. Cole, 110 SW3d 310, 314 (Ark. App. 2003)(followed)
- Bettinger v. Bettinger, 396 SE2d 709, 714-715 (W.Va. 1990)(followed)
- Bosserman v. Bosserman, 384 SE2d 104, 108 (Va. App. 1989)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…