Summary
The Georgia Supreme Court answered certified questions from the Eleventh Circuit concerning a one-year limitations provision in a multiple-line homeowner’s insurance policy. The court held that the Georgia Insurance Commissioner lacked authority to promulgate a rule extending the Standard Fire Policy’s two-year limitations period to non-fire coverage in multiple-line policies. Accordingly, the policy’s one-year limitations period applied to White’s theft-related claim, which was barred as untimely.
Holdings
- The Insurance Commissioner exceeded his legal authority by promulgating Rule 120-2-20-.02 to require the Standard Fire Policy's two-year limitation period for nonfire coverage, including theft coverage, in multiple-line policies.
- The one-year limitation period in White's policy was enforceable as to theft coverage, and White's claim was barred because he did not initiate it within that period.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Georgia Insurance Commissioner had authority to promulgate Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 120-2-20-.02, which required first-party property policies to provide a limitation period no less favorable than the two-year period in Georgia's Standard Fire Policy.
- Whether the one-year limitation period in White's multiple-line policy was enforceable as to theft-related coverage and barred White's claim.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Dean, 212 Ga. App. 262, 265(1), 441 S.E.2d 436 (1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…