Summary
The Supreme Court of Georgia reviewed enforcement of an oral settlement agreement incorporated into a final divorce decree. The court held that the parties’ agreement to finally settle all divorce issues included the wife’s waiver of any interest in the husband’s unmentioned civil service retirement account, affirming the trial court’s judgment.
Holdings
- The parties' settlement resolved all issues in the divorce action and included wife's agreement to waive any interest or claim she may have had in husband's civil-service retirement.
- The trial court was authorized to include the waiver language in the final divorce decree because the language reflected the parties' mutual assent rather than adding an unagreed substantive term.
Questions Presented
- Whether the parties' oral settlement agreement included wife's agreement to waive any claim to husband's unvested civil-service retirement.
- Whether the trial court improperly added a substantive term to the parties' settlement by incorporating waiver language concerning retirement accounts not expressly mentioned in the announced settlement.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (15)
- DeGarmo v. DeGarmo, 269 Ga. 480 (499 S.E.2d 317) (1998)(distinguished)
- Reichard v. Reichard, 262 Ga. 561 (423 S.E.2d 241) (1992)(distinguished)
- Herndon v. Herndon, 227 Ga. 781, 783-784 (183 S.E.2d 386) (1971)(followed)
- Buckner v. Buckner, 294 Ga. 705, 708 (755 S.E.2d 722) (2014)(followed)
- Cousins v. Cousins, 253 Ga. 30, 31 (1) (315 S.E.2d 420) (1984)(followed)
- Frickey v. Jones, 280 Ga. 573, 575 (630 S.E.2d 374) (2006)(followed)
- Paul v. Paul, 235 Ga. 382, 384 (219 S.E.2d 736) (1975)(followed)
- Allen v. Sea Gardens Seafood, Inc., 290 Ga. 715, 717 (2) (723 S.E.2d 669) (2012)(followed)
- Sponsler v. Sponsler, 287 Ga. 725, 727 (1) (699 S.E.2d 22) (2010)(followed)
- Anderson v. Larkin, 190 Ga. App. 283, 284-285 (378 S.E.2d 707) (1989)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…