Summary
A three-judge federal district court held that Sumter County School District's 1973 shift to at-large board elections was subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act because it resulted from a legislative enactment reflecting elected representatives' policy choices. The court granted plaintiffs summary judgment, enjoined further use of the unprecleared at-large plan, and remanded the case to a single-judge district court to supervise development of a legally enforceable election plan.
Holdings
- The 1973 change to an at-large method of electing the Sumter County School District Board was subject to Section 5 preclearance because it resulted from the policy choices of the Georgia Legislature, not from a court-directed election plan. The continued use of the system after the Attorney General's objection violated Section 5.
- The three-judge Section 5 court lacked authority to remedy the malapportionment underlying the invalid election system. After deciding the Section 5 issue, it was required to remand the case to a single-judge district court to supervise development and implementation of a legally enforceable election plan.
Questions Presented
- Whether the 1973 change from a mixed district and at-large election system to an entirely at-large system was subject to the Section 5 preclearance requirements of the Voting Rights Act.
- Whether the three-judge Section 5 court could remedy the underlying malapportionment or should remand that issue to a single-judge district court.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Carter v. Crenshaw, C.A. No. 768 (M.D. Ga., Americus Division)(applied)
- McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 101 S. Ct. 2224, 68 L. Ed. 2d 724 (1981)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…