Summary
The Supreme Court of Hawai'i held that the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations issued a notification of violation against Paul's Electrical Service, Inc. after an unreasonable two-year delay. Because the notification was invalid, the court vacated the circuit court's judgment affirming a three-year suspension from government construction contracts and remanded for entry of judgment in favor of Paul's Electrical. The opinion also clarified the standards for reviewing administrative agency decisions and discretionary determinations.
Holdings
- When HRS § 104-23 does not specify a deadline for issuing a notification of violation, DLIR must issue the notification within a reasonable time.
- DLIR's more-than-two-year delay in issuing the third notification of violation was unreasonable, rendering the notification invalid.
- DLIR's interpretation of HRS § 104-23 was not entitled to deference because the legislature did not delegate discretion to DLIR to interpret the statute's procedural requirements.
Questions Presented
- Whether HRS § 104-23 requires DLIR to issue a notification of violation within a reasonable time even though the statute specifies no deadline.
- Whether DLIR's more-than-two-year delay in issuing the third notification of violation was reasonable because proceedings on the alleged second violation were still pending.
- Whether DLIR's interpretation of the procedural requirements of HRS § 104-23 was entitled to deference.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (21)
- Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple of Hawaii v. Sullivan, 87 Hawai'i 217, 953 P.2d 1315 (1998)(followed)
- Bragg v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins., 81 Hawai'i 302, 916 P.2d 1203 (1996)(followed)
- In re Hawaiian Elec. Co., 81 Hawai'i 459, 918 P.2d 561 (1996)(followed)
- Outdoor Circle v. Harold K.L. Castle Trust Estate, 4 Haw. App. 633, 675 P.2d 784 (1983)(followed)
- In re Wai'ola O Moloka'i, Inc., 103 Hawai'i 401, 83 P.3d 664 (2004)(limited)
- Morgan v. Planning Department, County of Kauai, 104 Hawai'i 173, 86 P.3d 982 (2004)(followed)
- TIG Insurance Co. v. Kauhane, 101 Hawai'i 311, 67 P.3d 810 (App. 2003)(followed)
- In re Gray Line Hawai'i Ltd., 93 Hawai'i 45, 995 P.2d 776 (2000)(followed)
- Hyatt Corp. v. Honolulu Liquor Commission, 69 Haw. 238, 738 P.2d 1205 (1987)(followed)
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Schmidt, 104 Hawai'i 261, 88 P.3d 196 (2004)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…