State v. Reinhart

Summary

The Supreme Court of Hawaii held that insufficient evidence supported Steven Reinhart's conviction for violating a warning citation issued under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 709-906. The court reversed the Intermediate Court of Appeals judgment and the family court judgment.

Holdings

1. The evidence was insufficient to establish that Reinhart violated the warning citation ordering him to leave the premises and prohibiting his return before the citation expired.

Questions Presented

1. Whether sufficient evidence supported Reinhart's conviction for Abuse of Family and Household Members based on an alleged violation of a police warning citation issued under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 709-906(4).

Disposition

reversed