McCarthy v. Pacific Loan, Inc.

61 B.R. 288 (D. Haw. 1986) · United States District Court for the District of Hawaii · May 14, 1986 · No. Civ. No. 82-0292

Summary

The court addresses Pacific Loan's request for relief arising from Theo H. Davies & Co.'s failure to appear or timely disclose in response to garnishment process. It concludes that, absent a judgment against the garnishee, the debt remained property of the bankrupt judgment debtor and proceedings concerning the funds were barred by the automatic stay. The court dismisses the order to show cause as to the funds but authorizes monetary sanctions for Davies's failure to comply with the garnishment process.

Holdings

  1. Under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 652-8, a garnishee's failure to appear or disclose does not automatically convert the debt owed to the judgment debtor into the garnishee's own proper debt; before judgment may be entered against the garnishee, the plaintiff must prove the garnishee's liability at trial. A garnishee may disclose up until judgment.
  2. Because the $30,000 remained property of American Resources, the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3) deprived the court of jurisdiction to adjudicate Pacific's claim against those funds.
  3. Although the court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the $30,000 debt while it remained property of the bankruptcy estate, it retained jurisdiction over Davies for its repeated failure to respond to the garnishee process and could impose monetary sanctions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Davies's failure to appear or file a written disclosure by the garnishment summons's return date transformed the debt owed to American Resources into Davies's own proper debt under Hawaii Revised Statutes § 652-8.
  2. Whether the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3) deprived the district court of jurisdiction to adjudicate Pacific's claim against funds that remained property of American Resources' bankruptcy estate.
  3. Whether the court retained jurisdiction to sanction Davies for failing to comply with the garnishee summons and subsequent court process.
  4. Whether Davies's alleged oral disclosures and good-faith uncertainty caused by American Resources' bankruptcy excused its failure to make a timely written disclosure or appear.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (8)

  • In re Autobahn Classics, Inc., 29 B.R. 625, 627 (1983)(followed)
  • Bank of Hawaii v. Parke, 15 Haw. 645 (1904)(followed)
  • Payne v. Furtado, 22 Haw. 723, 730-731 (1915)(followed)
  • Morris Lake & Son v. Strickland, 55 So. 2d 51 (La. App. 1951)(distinguished)
  • Juneau Spruce Corp. v. International L. & W. Union, 131 F. Supp. 866, 871-873 (D. Haw. 1955)(followed)
  • In re American Resources, 54 B.R. 245 (Bankr. Haw. 1985)(discussed)
  • McCarthy, et al. v. Pacific Loan, Inc., et al., 789 F.2d 921 (9th Cir. 1986) (memorandum)(followed as law of the case)
  • United States v. United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 67 S. Ct. 677, 91 L. Ed. 884 (1947)(discussed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Hawaii United States District Court For The District