Driver v. SI Corporation, 139 Idaho 423

80 P.3d 1024 (2003) · Supreme Court of Idaho · November 13, 2003 · No. Nos. 28258, 28921

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court reviewed challenges to an arbitration award arising from the sale of BonTerra America, Inc. to SI Corporation. The court held that SI failed to timely state specific grounds for vacating or modifying the award, affirmed confirmation of the arbitration award, and held that attorney fees could be awarded for the confirmation proceedings and on appeal. The case was remanded for the district court to determine the fees incurred below.

Holdings

  1. An application to vacate or modify an arbitration award must identify the specific statutory grounds for relief within the ninety-day period imposed by Idaho Code sections 7-912 and 7-913. SI's motion, which did not identify specific grounds until its supporting brief was filed after the deadline, was insufficient.
  2. A cross-appeal was unnecessary because the Drivers sought only to sustain the judgment on a reason presented below, rather than obtain additional or different relief.
  3. Attorney fees may be awarded under Idaho Code section 7-914 for proceedings to confirm an arbitration award because the statute's authorization of costs and disbursements includes attorney fees incurred in those proceedings.
  4. The Drivers were entitled to attorney fees on appeal in the court's discretion because SI's appeal challenged the arbitration award on grounds beyond the limited statutory scope of review.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether SI's motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award adequately stated specific statutory grounds within the ninety-day period required by Idaho Code sections 7-911 and 7-912.
  2. Whether the district court could consider the Drivers' challenge to the timeliness and specificity of SI's motion without a cross-appeal.
  3. Whether attorney fees incurred in a proceeding to confirm an arbitration award may be awarded under Idaho Code section 7-914.
  4. Whether the Drivers were entitled to attorney fees on appeal.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (26)

  • Chicoine v. Bignall, 127 Idaho 225, 899 P.2d 438 (1995)(followed)
  • Hughes v. Hughes, 123 Idaho 711, 851 P.2d 1007 (Ct. App. 1993)(followed)
  • Bingham County Comm'n v. Interstate Electric Co., 105 Idaho 36, 665 P.2d 1046 (1983)(followed)
  • Hecla Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill Co., 101 Idaho 557, 617 P.2d 861 (1980)(followed)
  • Nanney v. Linella, Inc., 130 Idaho 477, 943 P.2d 67 (Ct. App. 1997)(considered)
  • Walker v. Shoshone County, 112 Idaho 991, 739 P.2d 290 (1987)(followed)
  • Idaho Fair Share v. Idaho Public Utilities Comm'n, 113 Idaho 959, 751 P.2d 107 (1988)(limited)
  • J.R. Simplot Co. v. Idaho State Tax Comm'n, 120 Idaho 849, 820 P.2d 1206 (1991)(overruled_authority)
  • George W. Watkins Family v. Messenger, 118 Idaho 537, 797 P.2d 1385 (1990)(followed)
  • Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of Comm'rs of Valley County, 132 Idaho 551, 976 P.2d 477 (1999)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…