Mumford v. Miller, 143 Idaho 99

137 P.3d 1021 (2006) · Supreme Court of Idaho · May 25, 2006 · No. No. 32061

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed the district court's refusal to vacate or modify an arbitration award denying attorney fees to Mark Mumford. The court held that the arbitrator did not exceed his powers because the parties submitted the attorney-fee issue for determination, and review of the arbitrator's factual and legal conclusions was limited under Idaho's Uniform Arbitration Act. The court awarded respondents attorney fees incurred on appeal under Idaho Code section 12-121.

Holdings

  1. The arbitrator did not exceed his powers because the parties submitted the attorney-fee issue for arbitration and the arbitrator resolved it by exercising factual and legal judgment.
  2. The respondents were not entitled to appellate sanctions because they provided no supporting argument or authority establishing that the appeal was premature, procedurally defective, or frivolous.
  3. The respondents were entitled to attorney fees under Idaho Code section 12-121 for appellate work performed by Owen, James, Vernon & Weeks, P.A.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the arbitrator exceeded his powers under Idaho Code section 7-912(a)(3) by declining to award Mumford attorney fees under the contract.
  2. Whether sanctions or attorney fees should be awarded to the respondents on appeal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Moore v. Omnicare, Inc., 141 Idaho 809, 814-17, 118 P.3d 141, 147-49 (2005)(followed)
  • Bingham County Comm'n v. Interstate Elec. Co., 105 Idaho 36, 42, 665 P.2d 1046, 1052 (1983)(followed)
  • Eighteen Mile Ranch LLC v. Nord Excavating, 141 Idaho 716, 718-19, 117 P.3d 130, 132-33 (2005)(followed)
  • Burns v. Baldwin, 138 Idaho 480, 487, 65 P.3d 502, 509 (2003)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…