Stewart v. Stewart

152 P.3d 544, 143 Idaho 673 (2007) · Supreme Court of Idaho · January 26, 2007 · No. No. 31905

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court reviewed a divorce judgment involving the characterization and valuation of professional goodwill in a dermatology practice and an award of spousal maintenance. The court affirmed the community-property valuation, the unequal property division, and the award of $5,166 per month in maintenance for twelve years. The court denied attorney fees on appeal but awarded costs.

Holdings

  1. Goodwill of an independent professional services corporation is calculable and divisible as community property to the extent it has value beyond the professional spouse's personal skill, knowledge, and other personal attributes.
  2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by relying on the capitalized excess-earnings method and the expert evidence to value James's interest in DCI's goodwill at $210,747.
  3. The magistrate court did not abuse its discretion by awarding Sarah $5,166 per month in spousal maintenance for twelve years, notwithstanding the mathematical error in the original calculation and the community-property award.
  4. Sarah was not entitled to attorney fees on appeal under Idaho Code sections 12-121 or 32-704, although she was awarded appellate costs.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether goodwill associated with an independent professional services corporation may constitute divisible community property in a divorce proceeding when valued separately from the professional spouse's personal skill and knowledge.
  2. Whether the magistrate court acted within its discretion by using the capitalized excess-earnings method and the evidence presented by Sarah's expert to value James's interest in the corporation's goodwill.
  3. Whether the mathematical error in the magistrate court's initial maintenance calculation required reversal or reduction of the $5,166-per-month, twelve-year spousal-maintenance award.
  4. Whether Sarah was entitled to attorney fees on appeal under Idaho Code sections 12-121 and 32-704.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (21)

  • Antill v. Antill, 127 Idaho 954, 908 P.2d 1261 (1996)(followed)
  • Reed v. Reed, 137 Idaho 53, 44 P.3d 1108 (2002)(followed)
  • Hunt v. Hunt, 137 Idaho 18, 43 P.3d 777 (2002)(followed)
  • Chandler v. Chandler, 136 Idaho 246, 32 P.3d 140 (2001)(followed)
  • Maslen v. Maslen, 121 Idaho 85, 822 P.2d 982 (1991)(followed)
  • Koontz v. Koontz, 101 Idaho 51, 607 P.2d 1325 (1980)(followed)
  • Shumway v. Shumway, 106 Idaho 415, 679 P.2d 1133 (1984)(followed)
  • Martsch v. Martsch, 103 Idaho 142, 645 P.2d 882 (1982)(followed)
  • State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 768 P.2d 1331 (1989)(followed)
  • Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co., 119 Idaho 87, 803 P.2d 993 (1991)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…