Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation District, 148 Idaho 157

219 P.3d 804 (2009) · Supreme Court of Idaho · September 30, 2009 · No. No. 35543-2008

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed a judgment requiring the Big Lost River Irrigation District to allocate conveyance losses from storage water using a universal shrink method. The court held that a 1936 decree did not require allocation by river reach and that the Idaho Department of Water Resources rule governing watermaster accounting did not control the District's allocation among its water users.

Holdings

  1. The 1936 decree did not require conveyance losses from the district's storage water to be apportioned by river reach and therefore did not restrict the district from using the universal shrink method.
  2. The universal shrink method is lawful because conveyance loss is a cost of delivering storage water, and the irrigation district may allocate that cost proportionately among the district's storage-water users.
  3. No party was entitled to attorney fees on appeal, although respondents were awarded costs.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the 1936 decree limited the irrigation district's discretion to allocate conveyance losses using the universal shrink method.
  2. Whether the universal shrink method of allocating conveyance losses among the irrigation district's storage-water users was lawful.
  3. Whether any party was entitled to attorney fees on appeal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Vanvooren v. Astin, 141 Idaho 440, 444, 111 P.3d 125, 129 (2005)(followed)
  • O'Guin v. Bingham County, 139 Idaho 9, 15, 72 P.3d 849, 855 (2003)(followed)
  • Farmers' Co-operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irr. Dist., 14 Idaho 450, 458-59, 94 P. 761, 763 (1908)(followed)
  • Yaden v. Gem Irr. Dist., 37 Idaho 300, 308, 216 P. 250, 252 (1923)(followed)
  • Nampa & Meridian Irr. Dist. v. Barclay, 56 Idaho 13, 18, 47 P.2d 916, 918 (1935)(followed)
  • Colburn v. Wilson, 24 Idaho 94, 132 P. 579 (1913)(followed)
  • Gedney v. Snake River Irrigation District, 61 Idaho 605, 104 P.2d 909 (1940)(followed)
  • Niday v. Barker, 16 Idaho 73, 101 P. 254 (1909)(followed)
  • Callaghan v. Callaghan, 142 Idaho 185, 190, 125 P.3d 1061, 1066 (2005)(followed)
  • Fenwick v. Idaho Dept. of Lands, 144 Idaho 318, 324, 160 P.3d 757, 763 (2007)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…