Joseph Henry v. Department of Correction

154 Idaho 143 (2013) · Supreme Court of the State of Idaho · January 23, 2013 · No. 39039-2011

Summary

The Idaho Supreme Court affirmed an Industrial Commission decision denying workers’ compensation benefits to Joseph Henry for a heart attack suffered shortly after he arrived at work. The court held that Henry failed to establish to a reasonable medical probability that workplace activities caused or contributed to the plaque rupture that triggered his heart attack. The court concluded that the Commission’s findings were supported by substantial and competent evidence and were not clearly erroneous.

Holdings

  1. The Commission did not require Henry to prove that employment was the sole or primary cause of his heart attack; it properly required him to establish to a reasonable medical probability that his employment caused or contributed to the injury.
  2. The Commission's finding that Henry failed to prove that his heart attack was triggered by activities at work was not clearly erroneous and was supported by substantial and competent evidence.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Industrial Commission applied the wrong burden of proof by requiring Henry to prove that employment was the sole or primary cause of his heart attack.
  2. Whether substantial and competent evidence supported the Commission's finding that Henry failed to prove, to a reasonable medical probability, that the plaque rupture causing his heart attack was triggered by activities at work.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Horner v. Ponderosa Pine Logging, 107 Idaho 1111, 695 P.2d 1250 (1985)(followed)
  • Eacret v. Clearwater Forest Industries, 136 Idaho 733, 40 P.3d 91 (2002)(followed)
  • Combes v. State, Industrial Special Indemnity Fund, 130 Idaho 430, 942 P.2d 554 (1997)(followed)
  • Spivey v. Novartis Seed Inc., 137 Idaho 29, 42 P.3d 788 (2002)(followed)
  • Painter v. Potlatch Corp., 138 Idaho 309, 63 P.3d 435 (2003)(followed)
  • Stevens-McAtee v. Potlatch Corp., 145 Idaho 325, 179 P.3d 288 (2008)(followed)
  • Dinius v. Loving Care and More, Inc., 133 Idaho 572, 990 P.2d 738 (1999)(followed)
  • Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto Shop, 58 Idaho 438, 74 P.2d 171 (1937)(discussed)
  • Dinneen v. Finch, 100 Idaho 620, 603 P.2d 575 (1979)(discussed)
  • Wood v. Hoglund, 131 Idaho 700, 963 P.2d 383 (1998)(discussed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…