Ralph v. Pryor (In re Estate of Pryor)

430 Ill. Dec. 772 (Ill. App. Ct. 2017) · Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District · December 1, 2017 · No. Appeal No. 3-17-0023; Circuit No. 13-P-54

Summary

The Illinois Appellate Court, Third District, affirmed the denial of Kathy Ralph’s request to appoint a special representative to act in a declaratory judgment proceeding concerning competing trust documents governing Ethel Marie Pryor’s estate. The majority held that section 8-1(e) of the Illinois Probate Act authorizes appointment of a special administrator only to defend a will contest, which Ralph expressly disclaimed. Justice O’Brien dissented, concluding that the representative’s potential conflict of interest warranted appointment of a special representative under section 23-2 of the Probate Act.

Holdings

  1. Section 8-1(e) of the Probate Act authorizes appointment of a special administrator to defend a proceeding contesting the validity of a will; it does not apply where the petitioner expressly concedes that the will is not being contested.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether section 8-1(e) of the Illinois Probate Act authorizes appointment of a special administrator or special representative to participate in a declaratory judgment action concerning which trust instrument governs distribution of estate assets when the petitioner is not contesting the validity of the will.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Relf v. Shatayeva, 2013 IL 114925, ¶ 21(followed)
  • McVey v. M.L.K. Enterprises, LLC, 2015 IL 118143, ¶ 11(followed)
  • In re Estate of Hawley, 183 Ill. App. 3d 107(discussed in dissent)
  • Conant v. Lansden, 341 Ill. App. 488 (1950)(discussed in dissent)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…