Summary
The court held that a justice of the peace has jurisdiction over an action against an administrator on a claim against the estate, where the amount does not exceed $200, and that a judgment directing payment as a claim of the seventh class is valid. The probate court should allow such a judgment as a claim.
Holdings
- A justice of the peace has jurisdiction over an action against an administrator on a cause of action against the intestate when the amount claimed does not exceed $200 and the action is of a character within the justice's statutory jurisdiction.
- The fact that a judgment against an administrator directed payment of the sum recovered, with costs, 'as a claim of the seventh class' does not make the judgment erroneous.
- A claim against a deceased person's estate is established in probate by filing a certified copy of a judgment regularly obtained against the personal representative.
Questions Presented
- Whether a justice of the peace has jurisdiction of an action against an administrator upon an alleged cause of action against his intestate.
- Whether a judgment against an administrator that directs payment 'as a claim of the seventh class' is erroneous.
- Whether presenting a certified copy of a regularly obtained judgment to the probate court is proper practice to establish a claim against an estate.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- Williams v. Blankenship, 12 Ill. 122 (1847)(discussed)
- Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 152 Ill. 347 (1894)(cited)
- Darling v. McDonald, 101 Ill. 370 (1881)(followed)
- McCall v. Lee, 120 Ill. 261 (1887)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…