Derek Steven McCauley v. Newrez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing

25A-MF-973 (Ind. Ct. App. Jan. 27, 2026) · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 27, 2026 · No. 25A-MF-973

Summary

The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Derek Steven McCauley’s motion to vacate a mortgage-foreclosure judgment in favor of Newrez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. The court held that McCauley waived appellate review by failing to present a coherent or cogent argument and summarily rejected his sovereign-citizen theories as legally baseless.

Holdings

  1. A pro se litigant is held to the same standards as trained counsel and waives appellate review when the appellant fails to present a coherent and cogent argument supported by the appellate rules.
  2. Sovereign-citizen theories asserting that a person is beyond the jurisdiction of the courts are legally baseless and may be summarily rejected.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether McCauley presented a cogent appellate argument sufficient to obtain review of the trial court's denial of his motion to vacate the foreclosure judgment.
  2. Whether McCauley's sovereign-citizen-style arguments provided a legally cognizable basis for relief from the foreclosure judgment.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Flowers v. Jugg, 24A-CT-1131, at *1 n.1 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2024) (mem.)(followed)
  • Lewis v. State, 532 S.W.3d 423, 430 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016)(followed)
  • Martin v. Hunt, 130 N.E.3d 135, 136 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019)(followed)
  • Spainhower v. Smart & Kessler, LLC, 176 N.E.3d 258, 263 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021)(followed)
  • Basic v. Amouri, 58 N.E.3d 980, 984 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016)(followed)
  • U.S. v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 767 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…