Summary
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of Derek Steven McCauley’s motion to vacate a mortgage-foreclosure judgment in favor of Newrez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. The court held that McCauley waived appellate review by failing to present a coherent or cogent argument and summarily rejected his sovereign-citizen theories as legally baseless.
Holdings
- A pro se litigant is held to the same standards as trained counsel and waives appellate review when the appellant fails to present a coherent and cogent argument supported by the appellate rules.
- Sovereign-citizen theories asserting that a person is beyond the jurisdiction of the courts are legally baseless and may be summarily rejected.
Questions Presented
- Whether McCauley presented a cogent appellate argument sufficient to obtain review of the trial court's denial of his motion to vacate the foreclosure judgment.
- Whether McCauley's sovereign-citizen-style arguments provided a legally cognizable basis for relief from the foreclosure judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Flowers v. Jugg, 24A-CT-1131, at *1 n.1 (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 4, 2024) (mem.)(followed)
- Lewis v. State, 532 S.W.3d 423, 430 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016)(followed)
- Martin v. Hunt, 130 N.E.3d 135, 136 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019)(followed)
- Spainhower v. Smart & Kessler, LLC, 176 N.E.3d 258, 263 (Ind. Ct. App. 2021)(followed)
- Basic v. Amouri, 58 N.E.3d 980, 984 (Ind. Ct. App. 2016)(followed)
- U.S. v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 767 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…