Summary
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed an order compelling arbitration in a dispute between homeowners and their builder concerning alleged construction defects. The court held that the homeowners’ claims arose under a limited warranty agreement containing mandatory arbitration language, rather than solely under a construction agreement with an optional arbitration provision. The court also held that the builder did not waive arbitration through its litigation conduct and that prejudice was irrelevant to the waiver analysis under Indiana law.
Holdings
- The Rechliczes' claims arose under the limited warranty agreement, whose unambiguous language required that warranty claims be resolved by arbitration. The construction agreement's optional-arbitration provision and reasonable-time requirement did not govern those claims.
- Prejudice or detrimental reliance is not required and is irrelevant to determining whether a party waived its contractual right to compel arbitration under Indiana law.
- Price Point did not waive its right to compel arbitration by waiting fourteen months, participating in case-management and discovery matters, failing to plead arbitration as an affirmative defense, or filing a third-party complaint against a nonparty to the arbitration agreement.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Rechliczes' construction-defect and failure-to-cure claims were subject to the mandatory arbitration provision in the limited warranty agreement.
- Whether Price Point waived its contractual right to compel arbitration by delaying its motion and participating in litigation.
- Whether prejudice to the opposing party is relevant to waiver of the right to compel arbitration under Indiana law.
- Whether Price Point waived arbitration by failing to plead arbitration as an affirmative defense or by filing a third-party complaint against a subcontractor.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (38)
- Coronado v. Coronado, 243 N.E.3d 1121, 1124 (Ind. Ct. App. 2024)(followed)
- Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Watson, 70 N.E.3d 380, 384 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017)(followed)
- Decker v. Star Fin. Grp., Inc., 204 N.E.3d 918, 920-21 (Ind. 2023)(followed)
- Taylor Bldg. Corp. of Am. v. Milton, 271 N.E.3d 626, 630, 633 (Ind. Ct. App. 2025)(followed)
- Koors v. Steffen, 916 N.E.2d 212, 215 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009)(followed)
- Safety Nat’l Cas. Co. v. Cinergy Corp., 829 N.E.2d 986, 1000, 1004 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005)(followed)
- Illinois Cas. Co. v. B&S of Fort Wayne Inc., 235 N.E.3d 827, 837-38 (Ind. 2024)(followed)
- Martin v. Yasuda, 829 F.3d 1118, 1123 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 84 (2002)(followed)
- Welty Bldg. Co. v. Indy Fedreau Co., 985 N.E.2d 792, 798-99, 803 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 38.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.