Summary
The Indiana Supreme Court found that attorney Hong-Min Jun violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.2(d) by counseling or assisting a client in conduct involving false statements to obtain expedited immigration processing. The Court imposed a public reprimand, assessed costs against the respondent, and discharged the hearing officer.
Holdings
- The respondent violated Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.2(d) by counseling or assisting his client to engage in conduct he knew to be criminal or fraudulent.
- A public reprimand was an appropriate sanction for the respondent's misconduct.
Questions Presented
- Whether the respondent counseled or assisted a client in conduct the respondent knew to be criminal or fraudulent, in violation of Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 1.2(d).
- What discipline was appropriate for the respondent's professional misconduct.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Matter of Campanella, 56 N.E.3d 631, 633 (Ind. 2016)(followed)
- Matter of Scionti, 630 N.E.2d 1358 (Ind. 1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…