Summary
The Indiana Supreme Court held that a community corrections program director lacked authority to deprive Richard Shepard of earned good time credit for violations of work-release conditions. Under Indiana Code section 35-38-2.6-6(d), such deprivation could be imposed only pursuant to Department of Correction rules, and no rule delegated that authority to the program director. The court reversed the trial court’s credit-time determination and remanded for recalculation to include the 190 days earned in the work-release program.
Holdings
- A community-corrections program director lacks authority to deprive an offender directly placed in a community-corrections program of earned good-time credit unless the Department of Correction has promulgated a rule delegating that authority.
- Shepard was entitled to 190 days of earned good-time credit for the 190 actual days he served in the work-release program, because the program director's unauthorized deductions could not eliminate that credit.
Questions Presented
- Whether a community-corrections program director had statutory or regulatory authority to deprive a directly placed offender of earned good-time credit.
- Whether Shepard was entitled to credit for the 190 actual days he served in the community-corrections work-release program.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (1)
- Jackson v. State, 50 N.E.3d 767, 770 (Ind. 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…