Hochstetler v. Elkhart County Highway Department

868 N.E.2d 425 (Ind. 2007) · Supreme Court of Indiana · June 20, 2007 · No. No. 20S05-0703-CV-97

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court held that county governmental entities were immune under the Indiana Tort Claims Act from a negligence claim arising from a tree that fell across a county road during a severe storm. The court concluded that the fallen tree was a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather and affirmed summary judgment for the defendants. Justice Dickson dissented, citing factual questions concerning the condition's temporary nature and causation.

Holdings

  1. The county defendants were immune from liability because the fallen tree was a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather.
  2. The Indiana Tort Claims Act does not bar claims in which the road condition resulted from poor inspection, design, or maintenance rather than from weather.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the fallen tree constituted a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather under Indiana Code section 34-13-3-3(3).
  2. Whether the county defendants were entitled to summary judgment based on immunity under the Indiana Tort Claims Act.
  3. Whether the weather-related immunity provision applies where the plaintiff contends the condition resulted from the government's failure to monitor or maintain the road.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Higert v. City of Greencastle, 43 Ind. 574 (1873)(followed)
  • Johnson v. City of Evansville, 95 Ind. App. 417, 180 N.E. 600 (1932)(considered)
  • City of Muncie v. Hey, 164 Ind. 570, 74 N.E. 250 (1905)(considered)
  • Mangold v. Ind. Dep't of Natural Res., 756 N.E.2d 970 (Ind. 2001)(followed)
  • Catt v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Knox County, 779 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 2002)(followed)
  • Hochstetler v. Elkhart County Highway Dep't, 855 N.E.2d 731 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006)(vacated)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…