Summary
The Indiana Supreme Court held that county governmental entities were immune under the Indiana Tort Claims Act from a negligence claim arising from a tree that fell across a county road during a severe storm. The court concluded that the fallen tree was a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather and affirmed summary judgment for the defendants. Justice Dickson dissented, citing factual questions concerning the condition's temporary nature and causation.
Holdings
- The county defendants were immune from liability because the fallen tree was a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather.
- The Indiana Tort Claims Act does not bar claims in which the road condition resulted from poor inspection, design, or maintenance rather than from weather.
Questions Presented
- Whether the fallen tree constituted a temporary condition of a public thoroughfare resulting from weather under Indiana Code section 34-13-3-3(3).
- Whether the county defendants were entitled to summary judgment based on immunity under the Indiana Tort Claims Act.
- Whether the weather-related immunity provision applies where the plaintiff contends the condition resulted from the government's failure to monitor or maintain the road.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Higert v. City of Greencastle, 43 Ind. 574 (1873)(followed)
- Johnson v. City of Evansville, 95 Ind. App. 417, 180 N.E. 600 (1932)(considered)
- City of Muncie v. Hey, 164 Ind. 570, 74 N.E. 250 (1905)(considered)
- Mangold v. Ind. Dep't of Natural Res., 756 N.E.2d 970 (Ind. 2001)(followed)
- Catt v. Bd. of Comm'rs of Knox County, 779 N.E.2d 1 (Ind. 2002)(followed)
- Hochstetler v. Elkhart County Highway Dep't, 855 N.E.2d 731 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006)(vacated)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…