Summary
The Hawaiʻi Intermediate Court of Appeals dismissed Kona Wong Kapule’s appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The court held that the circuit court’s oral order denying a motion to quash was not appealable, and that no final judgment, interlocutory appeal authorization, collateral-order exception, or Forgay doctrine supported jurisdiction.
Holdings
- The oral order was not appealable because a minute order is not an appealable order, and the challenged oral order was not a decision that could be reduced to a final judgment.
- The order was not independently appealable under the collateral-order or Forgay doctrines.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Circuit Court's oral order denying Kapule's special appearance and motion to quash was appealable.
- Whether the Intermediate Court of Appeals had appellate jurisdiction under the final-judgment rule, the interlocutory-appeal statute, or the collateral-order or Forgay doctrines.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Abrams v. Cades, Schutte, Fleming & Wright, 88 Hawaiʻi 319, 321 n.3, 966 P.2d 631, 633 n.3 (1998)(followed)
- Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawaiʻi 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 (1994)(followed)
- Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawaiʻi 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016)(followed)
- Brown v. Wong, 71 Haw. 519, 795 P.2d 283 (1990)(followed)
- Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…