Psak v. Kardash

Summary

The Hawaiʻi Intermediate Court of Appeals denied Keith Kardash's motion for reconsideration, which it construed as seeking consolidation and reconsideration under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40. The court found that Kardash did not identify a point of law or fact overlooked or misapprehended in the prior summary disposition order and dismissed all other pending motions.

Holdings

1. Reconsideration was not warranted because Kardash failed to demonstrate a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in its March 31, 2026 summary disposition order.
2. The motion for consolidation was denied.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Kardash demonstrated a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in its March 31, 2026 summary disposition order.
2. Whether the pending matter should be consolidated with the related appeal.

Disposition

other