Summary
The Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review’s order granting Brandon Carter a 0% permanent partial disability award. The court held that the Board was not clearly wrong in finding the impairment evaluation supporting a higher award unreliable, particularly because it lacked documentation of objective mental-status testing. The court declined to resolve the separate issue concerning impairment ratings for medication use and noted that any potential psychiatric impairment had not yet been formally rated.
Holdings
- The Board was not clearly wrong in finding that Carter failed to establish permanent impairment from the compensable injury, apart from a possible psychiatric impairment that had not yet been formally rated, and in affirming the 0% permanent partial disability award.
- The court declined to decide the applicability of the impairment-guideline criteria concerning medication used to manage symptoms because the Board’s independent finding that Dr. Guberman’s mental-status impairment rating was unreliable was sufficient to resolve the appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review was clearly wrong in affirming a 0% permanent partial disability award.
- Whether the Board was required to accept Dr. Guberman’s 10% whole-person impairment assessment based on medication use and mental-status impairment.
- Whether the court needed to decide the applicability of the impairment-guideline criteria concerning medication used to manage symptoms.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, 250 W. Va. 510, 905 S.E.2d 528 (2024)(applied)
- In re Queen, 196 W. Va. 442, 473 S.E.2d 483 (1996)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…