Gibson v. ITT Hartford Insurance Company

621 N.W.2d 388 (Iowa 2001) · Supreme Court of Iowa · January 18, 2001 · No. No. 99-0386

Summary

The Supreme Court of Iowa reviewed Lee Gibson's claims against ITT Hartford Insurance Company arising from the handling of his workers' compensation benefits. The court held that the evidence was sufficient to submit punitive damages on Gibson's bad-faith and abuse-of-process claims, but affirmed judgment notwithstanding the verdict on his intentional-interference and fraudulent-misrepresentation claims. The court therefore reversed in part and affirmed in part.

Holdings

  1. Evidence sufficient to submit the underlying bad-faith and abuse-of-process claims may also be sufficient to submit punitive damages when it supports a finding of willful and wanton disregard for the plaintiff's rights. Here, ITT's intentional refusal to pay benefits and psychiatric treatment to which Gibson was legally entitled, despite knowledge of its obligations and the likely harm, was sufficient evidence of legal malice and highly probable harm to warrant jury consideration of punitive damages.
  2. The district court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the evidence did not show that ITT's conduct caused Dr. Bowman not to perform his alleged contract with Gibson.
  3. The district court correctly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the fraudulent-misrepresentation claim because there was insufficient evidence that Dr. Bowman relied on ITT's representation that The Garden Café would provide Gibson light-duty work.
  4. Because ITT did not cross-appeal from the judgment on the abuse-of-process claim, it could not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence supporting submission of that claim on Gibson's appeal.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the evidence was sufficient to submit Gibson's punitive-damages claims based on bad faith and abuse of process to the jury.
  2. Whether the district court properly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Gibson's intentional-interference-with-contract claim.
  3. Whether the district court properly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict on Gibson's fraudulent-misrepresentation claim.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (16)

  • Balmer v. Hawkeye Steel, 604 N.W.2d 639, 640-41 (Iowa 2000)(followed)
  • Econ. Roofing & Insulating v. Zumaris, 538 N.W.2d 641, 649 (Iowa 1995)(followed)
  • Midwest Home Distrib., Inc. v. Domco Indus. Ltd., 585 N.W.2d 735, 738 (Iowa 1998)(followed)
  • McClure v. Walgreen Co., 613 N.W.2d 225, 230-31 (Iowa 2000)(followed)
  • Fell v. Kewanee Farm Equip. Co., 457 N.W.2d 911, 919 (Iowa 1990)(followed)
  • Dolan v. Aid Ins. Co., 431 N.W.2d 790, 794 (Iowa 1988)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Continental Ins. Co., 85 Wis. 2d 675, 690, 271 N.W.2d 368, 376 (1978)(followed)
  • Boylan v. American Motorists Insurance Co., 489 N.W.2d 742, 743-44 (Iowa 1992)(followed)
  • Covia v. Robinson, 507 N.W.2d 411, 416 (Iowa 1993)(followed)
  • Christensen v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 554 N.W.2d 254, 260 (Iowa 1996)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…