Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics and Conduct v. Lane

642 N.W.2d 296 (Iowa 2002) · Supreme Court of Iowa · April 3, 2002 · No. No. 01-1929

Summary

The Iowa Supreme Court reviewed disciplinary findings against attorney William J. Lane for plagiarizing substantial portions of a post-trial brief and seeking compensation for work he claimed to have performed. The court found violations involving dishonesty, misrepresentation, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, fitness to practice law, and charging a clearly excessive fee. It suspended Lane's Iowa law license for six months.

Holdings

  1. Knowingly submitting another person's work as one's own in a court filing constitutes misrepresentation and violates Iowa Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4), as well as the related provisions of DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (5), and (6).
  2. A lawyer who knowingly submits a fee application misrepresenting the amount of time spent working on a case violates DR 2-106(A)'s prohibition against charging or collecting an illegal or clearly excessive fee.
  3. The Board failed to prove by a convincing preponderance of the evidence that Lane violated ethical rules in representing clients in the two bankruptcy matters.
  4. A six-month suspension of Lane's license was warranted for knowingly plagiarizing a brief, attempting to deceive the court, and seeking a clearly excessive fee, particularly in light of the need for deterrence, protection of the public, preservation of the profession's reputation, and Lane's prior discipline.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Lane violated Iowa disciplinary rules by plagiarizing a treatise in a post-trial brief and presenting the material to the court as his own.
  2. Whether Lane violated Iowa disciplinary rules by seeking an illegal or clearly excessive fee for eighty hours of work allegedly spent preparing a largely plagiarized brief.
  3. Whether the proven misconduct warranted suspension of Lane's license and, if so, the appropriate length of suspension.
  4. Whether the Board proved the separate alleged ethical violations arising from Lane's representation of clients in two bankruptcy matters.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (15)

  • Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. Sherman, 637 N.W.2d 183, 186 (Iowa 2001)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Board of County Commissioners, 868 F. Supp. 1226, 1231 (D. Colo. 1994), aff'd in part and disapproved in part, 85 F.3d 489 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Greer v. Kane, 519 U.S. 1042 (1996)(analogized)
  • Wesley v. Don Stein Buick, Inc., 987 F. Supp. 884, 886 (D. Kan. 1997)(followed)
  • Duran v. Carris, 238 F.3d 1268, 1273 (10th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • In re Ellingson, 230 B.R. 426, 435 (Bankr. D. Mont. 1999)(followed)
  • Ricotta v. State, 4 F. Supp. 2d 961, 987 (S.D. Cal. 1998)(followed)
  • Trigon Insurance Co. v. United States, 204 F.R.D. 277, 292 (E.D. Va. 2001)(analogized)
  • In re Zbiegien, 433 N.W.2d 871, 875 (Minn. 1988)(followed)
  • In re Lamberis, 93 Ill. 2d 222, 228, 443 N.E.2d 549, 552 (1982)(followed)
  • Alexander v. Irving Trust Co., 132 F. Supp. 364, 367 (S.D.N.Y. 1955)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…