Summary
The Iowa Supreme Court held that prior deferred sentences do not constitute deferred judgments or similar relief that would make a defendant ineligible for another deferred judgment under Iowa Code section 907.3(1)(c). The court vacated the Iowa Court of Appeals decision and the defendant’s sentence, remanding for resentencing.
Holdings
- Section 907.3(1)(c) prohibits a defendant who previously received two or more deferred judgments, including substantially equivalent relief from another jurisdiction, from obtaining another deferred judgment; it does not bar a defendant solely because she previously received two or more deferred sentences.
- The district court erred by refusing to consider a deferred judgment because Kamber's prior convictions resulted in deferred sentences rather than deferred judgments.
Questions Presented
- Whether Iowa Code section 907.3(1)(c) bars a defendant who previously received two deferred sentences from receiving a deferred judgment.
- Whether the district court erred by refusing to consider a deferred judgment as a sentencing option based on Kamber's prior deferred sentences.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- State v. Wiederien, 709 N.W.2d 538, 540 (Iowa 2006)(followed)
- State v. Beach, 630 N.W.2d 598, 600 (Iowa 2001)(followed)
- State v. Pickett, 671 N.W.2d 866, 870 (Iowa 2003)(followed)
- State v. Durgin, 328 N.W.2d 507, 509 (Iowa 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…