Xenia Rural Water District and Emcasco Insurance Company v. Norman Vegors

Xenia Rural Water District and Emcasco Insurance Company v. Norman Vegors · Supreme Court of Iowa · July 23, 2010 · No. 09-0426

Summary

The Iowa Supreme Court reviewed a workers’ compensation claim arising from a coworker’s truck striking the claimant. The court held that the claimant bore the burden of proving the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, including showing that any horseplay did not constitute a substantial deviation from employment. It also held that Iowa Code section 85.16(3) did not bar recovery because the coworker’s conduct was not motivated by reasons personal to the claimant, and remanded for further proceedings.

Holdings

  1. The claimant bears the burden of proving that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, including establishing that the claimant did not substantially deviate from employment by instigating or aggressively participating in horseplay.
  2. A claimant cannot recover for injuries resulting from the claimant's instigation or aggressive participation in horseplay that constitutes a substantial deviation from employment. The agency must assess the claimant's conduct under the four-factor horseplay-deviation analysis identified in the opinion.
  3. The term third party in Iowa Code section 85.16(3) can include a coworker.
  4. Section 85.16(3) did not bar Vegors's claim because Byrd's act was not taken for reasons personal to Vegors; it arose from the working environment rather than from imported personal animosity or a private dispute.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the injured employee or the employer bears the burden of proof on whether workplace horseplay constituted a deviation from the course of employment.
  2. Whether Vegors's conduct could be determined as a matter of law to constitute horseplay that substantially deviated from his employment and barred workers' compensation benefits.
  3. Whether Iowa Code section 85.16(3)'s reference to a willful act of a third party includes an employee's coworker.
  4. Whether section 85.16(3) bars compensation when the coworker's conduct arises from the workplace rather than from reasons personal to the injured employee.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (15)

  • Mosher v. Department of Inspections & Appeals, 671 N.W.2d 501, 508 (Iowa 2003)(followed)
  • Locate.Plus.Com, Inc. v. Iowa Department of Transportation, 650 N.W.2d 609, 612 (Iowa 2002)(followed)
  • Mycogen Seeds v. Sands, 686 N.W.2d 457, 464 (Iowa 2004)(followed)
  • Rojas v. Pine Ridge Farms, L.L.C., 779 N.W.2d 223, 231 (Iowa 2010)(followed)
  • Renda v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission, ___ N.W.2d ___, ___ (Iowa 2010)(followed)
  • Quaker Oats Co. v. Ciha, 552 N.W.2d 143, 150, 153-54 (Iowa 1996)(followed)
  • Miedema v. Dial Corp., 551 N.W.2d 309, 311 (Iowa 1996)(followed)
  • Ford v. Barcus, 261 Iowa 616, 623, 155 N.W.2d 507, 511 (1968)(followed)
  • Wittmer v. Dexter Manufacturing Co., 204 Iowa 180, 185, 214 N.W. 700, 702 (1927)(followed)
  • McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co., 288 N.W.2d 181, 186 (Iowa 1980)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…