Summary
The Kansas Supreme Court affirmed Tanner L. Green’s first-degree murder conviction, rejecting his challenge to the admission of photographs depicting the victim’s injuries. The court held that the photographs were relevant to establish the nature and cause of death and that their admission was not an abuse of discretion despite their gruesome nature.
Holdings
- The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the photographic slides because they were relevant and material to the medical examiner's testimony concerning the nature, extent, and cause of the victim's injuries and were not admitted solely to prejudice the defendant.
- The admission of Exhibit 33 did not constitute an abuse of discretion, and the defendant's challenge was also weakened because he did not object to its admission at trial.
- The trial court did not err by denying a mistrial after a juror fainted, struck his head, and was replaced by an alternate juror.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting eight photographic slides depicting the victim's severe head and neck injuries.
- Whether the admission of the crime-scene photograph marked Exhibit 33 was erroneous despite the absence of a trial objection.
- Whether the fainting and subsequent incapacitation of a juror warranted a mistrial.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (4)
- State v. Bell, 273 Kan. 49, 41 P.3d 783 (2001)(followed)
- State v. Verge, 272 Kan. 501, 515, 34 P.3d 449, 458 (2001)(followed)
- State v. Deal, 271 Kan. 483, 493, 23 P.3d 840 (2001)(followed)
- State v. Groschang, 272 Kan. 652, 667, 36 P.3d 231 (2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…