State v. Summers

293 Kan. 819 (2012) · Supreme Court of Kansas · February 3, 2012

Summary

The Kansas Supreme Court affirmed Jamaal Summers’ first-degree murder conviction. It held that Miranda warnings were not required for statements Summers made during a noncustodial interview, that evidence concerning the victim’s statement that “Homie” would visit was admissible or harmlessly cumulative, and that an improper prosecutorial question did not warrant reversal. The court vacated the lifetime postrelease-supervision portion of Summers’ off-grid life sentence.

Holdings

  1. The interrogation was noncustodial, so Miranda warnings were not required and the trial court properly admitted Summers's statements.
  2. The victim's statement to his wife that “Homie” was coming over was admissible under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 60-460(d)(3).
  3. The court did not decide whether the victim's statement to the neighbor was admissible because the statement was cumulative of other unobjected-to evidence.
  4. Although the prosecutor's question about whether defense counsel told the investigator what route Summers took was improper, it did not require reversal because the trial court sustained the objection, the question was not answered or repeated, and the evidence of guilt was compelling.
  5. A sentencing court lacks authority to impose postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence; the lifetime postrelease-supervision portion of Summers's sentence was vacated.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Summers was subjected to custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warnings when he spoke with police at his father's house.
  2. Whether the victim's statements to his wife and neighbor that “Homie” was coming over were admissible under K.S.A. 2006 Supp. 60-460(d)(3).
  3. Whether the prosecutor's improper cross-examination question about the route Summers took prejudiced his right to a fair trial after the trial court sustained an objection.
  4. Whether the trial court had authority to impose lifetime postrelease supervision in conjunction with an off-grid indeterminate life sentence.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (6)

  • State v. Edwards, 291 Kan. 532, 545, 243 P.3d 683 (2010)(followed)
  • State v. Morton, 286 Kan. 632, 640-643, 186 P.3d 785 (2008)(followed)
  • Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 324-25, 114 S. Ct. 1526, 128 L. Ed. 2d 293 (1994)(followed)
  • State v. Davis, 283 Kan. 569, 573, 158 P.3d 317 (2006)(followed)
  • State v. Inkelaar, 293 Kan. 414, 428, 264 P.3d 81 (2011)(followed)
  • State v. Cash, 293 Kan. 326, Syl. ¶ 2, 263 P.3d 786 (2011)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…