Summary
The Kansas Supreme Court imposed an indefinite suspension on Brent E. Lindberg for felony methamphetamine possession, possession of drug paraphernalia, and failure to answer a disciplinary complaint. The court considered the respondent's criminal conduct, violations of diversion and probation conditions, inconsistent testimony, substance-abuse treatment, and other aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
Holdings
- Attorney misconduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence, and the evidence in this case supported the hearing panel's conclusions of law.
- Lindberg violated KRPC 8.4(b) by committing felony methamphetamine possession and misdemeanor drug-paraphernalia offenses that adversely reflected on his fitness as a lawyer.
- Lindberg violated Supreme Court Rule 211(b) by failing to file an answer to the formal complaint within the required period.
- Because Lindberg did not file exceptions after receiving the hearing panel's final report, the report was deemed admitted in its entirety.
- Lindberg's failure to appear for his Supreme Court disciplinary hearing constituted an additional violation under Supreme Court Rule 212(e)(5).
- Indefinite suspension from the practice of law was the appropriate discipline, effective upon filing of the opinion, with compliance with Supreme Court Rule 218 and a Rule 219 reinstatement hearing required before reinstatement.
Questions Presented
- Whether the evidence established that Lindberg violated KRPC 8.4(b) by committing criminal acts that adversely reflected on his honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer.
- Whether Lindberg violated Supreme Court Rule 211(b) by failing to answer the formal disciplinary complaint.
- Whether the hearing panel's report was deemed admitted because Lindberg failed to file exceptions.
- Whether Lindberg's failure to appear before the Supreme Court constituted an additional disciplinary violation under Supreme Court Rule 212(e)(5).
- What discipline should be imposed for the violations.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- In re Foster, 292 Kan. 940, 945, 258 P.3d 375 (2011)(followed)
- In re Lober, 288 Kan. 498, 505, 204 P.3d 610 (2009)(followed)
- In re Dennis, 286 Kan. 708, 725, 188 P.3d 1 (2008)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…