Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Hurley

103 S.W.3d 21 (Ky. 2003) · Supreme Court of Kentucky · April 24, 2003

Summary

The Kentucky Supreme Court reversed the dismissal of Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.'s appeal as untimely. The court held that the notice of appeal was timely filed even though the filing fee check was initially unsigned and payment was completed after the filing date. Under Kentucky Rule of Civil Procedure 73.02(2), violations of appellate rules other than the timely filing requirement are subject to the appellate court's discretion rather than automatic dismissal.

Holdings

  1. Automatic dismissal was not required because Norwest's notice of appeal was timely filed; the failure to comply with another appellate-rule requirement was subject to the appellate court's discretionary sanction authority under CR 73.02(2).
  2. The erroneous designation of the order and date did not require dismissal where the notice otherwise identified the appeal from the final order and the Court of Appeals had treated the error as saved by substantial compliance.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Court of Appeals was required to dismiss Norwest's appeal because the filing fee was not recorded as paid until after the thirty-day appeal period.
  2. Whether CR 73.02(2) permits an appellate court to impose a sanction other than automatic dismissal when a notice of appeal was timely filed but another appellate-rule requirement was not satisfied.
  3. Whether the erroneous identification of the order and date in Norwest's notice of appeal required dismissal.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (3)

  • Foxworthy v. Veneers, 816 S.W.2d 907 (Ky. 1991)(followed)
  • Excel Energy, Inc. v. Commonwealth Institutional Securities, Inc., 37 S.W.3d 713 (Ky. 2001)(limited)
  • Dubost v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 777 F.2d 1561 (Fed. Cir. 1985)(persuasive)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…