Summary
The Kentucky Supreme Court imposed reciprocal discipline on Karen Martin Doyle following a Tennessee public censure for misconduct arising from contentious divorce proceedings. The court publicly reprimanded Doyle for violating Kentucky professional-conduct rules and ordered her to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings.
Holdings
- Under SCR 3.435(4), Kentucky must impose identical reciprocal discipline unless the respondent proves by substantial evidence a lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the out-of-state proceeding, or that the misconduct warrants substantially different discipline in Kentucky.
- Doyle's conduct violated SCR 3.130-3.1, SCR 3.130-3.4(f), SCR 3.130-3.4(c), and SCR 3.130-3.4(e).
Questions Presented
- Whether reciprocal discipline should be imposed under SCR 3.435 after the Supreme Court of Tennessee publicly censured Doyle.
- Whether Doyle's conduct violated the corresponding Kentucky Rules of Professional Conduct.
- Whether the court should resolve all pending disciplinary charges through the reciprocal-discipline order.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (0)
No outbound citations extracted.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…