Brandi Chipman v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

2008-SC-000895-DG · Supreme Court of Kentucky · May 19, 2010 · No. 2008-SC-000895-DG

Summary

The Kentucky Supreme Court held that a juvenile transferred to circuit court under the firearm-use provision of KRS 635.020(4) could be sentenced as a youthful offender only if the conviction and record established that the juvenile used or was complicit in the use of a firearm. Because Brandi Chipman's guilty plea to second-degree robbery established only that an accomplice possessed a firearm and did not establish her use or complicity in its use, the Court held that she was exempt from youthful-offender sentencing under KRS 640.040(4). The Court reversed the Court of Appeals, vacated the sentence, and remanded for juvenile sentencing.

Holdings

  1. A juvenile may be sentenced as a youthful offender only if the ultimate conviction continues to qualify under one of the youthful-offender provisions in KRS 635.020(2)-(7); the original charges or the prior basis for transfer do not by themselves support adult sentencing.
  2. The record did not establish that Chipman used a firearm or was complicit in another person's use of a firearm in committing the felony; therefore, she was exempt from youthful-offender sentencing and had to be sentenced as a juvenile.
  3. A defendant may stipulate to firearm use or complicity, or knowingly and voluntarily waive the right to juvenile sentencing, but no such stipulation, agreement, or waiver occurred here.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether KRS 640.040(4) required juvenile sentencing when a youthful offender transferred to circuit court under the firearm-use provision of KRS 635.020(4) pleaded guilty to a lesser-included offense whose elements did not include firearm use.
  2. What evidence or sources a sentencing court may consider in determining whether the juvenile continued to qualify for youthful-offender sentencing under KRS 635.020(4).

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (6)

  • Richardson v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, 260 S.W.3d 777, 778 (Ky. 2008)(followed)
  • Canter v. Commonwealth, 843 S.W.2d 330, 331-32 (Ky. 1992)(followed)
  • Kozak v. Commonwealth, 279 S.W.3d 129 (Ky. 2009)(followed)
  • Darden v. Commonwealth, 52 S.W.3d 574, 577 (Ky. 2001)(followed)
  • Haymon v. Commonwealth, 657 S.W.2d 239, 240 (Ky. 1983)(followed)
  • Miller v. Commonwealth, 283 S.W.3d 690, 695 (Ky. 2009)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…