Summary
The Kentucky Supreme Court granted the Kentucky Bar Association’s petition for reciprocal discipline against Philip M. Kleinsmith. The court imposed a public reprimand and one year of probation, subject to early termination upon completion of an approved ethics program, based on discipline previously imposed by the Arizona Supreme Court.
Holdings
- A final adjudication in another jurisdiction that an attorney was guilty of misconduct conclusively establishes that misconduct for purposes of a Kentucky disciplinary proceeding.
- An attorney is subject to identical discipline in Kentucky following an out-of-state disciplinary judgment unless the attorney proves by substantial evidence a lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the out-of-state proceeding, or that the misconduct warrants substantially different discipline in Kentucky.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Arizona Supreme Court's disciplinary judgment constituted a final adjudication establishing Kleinsmith's misconduct for purposes of Kentucky reciprocal discipline.
- Whether Kleinsmith demonstrated a jurisdictional defect, fraud, or grounds for substantially different discipline so as to avoid identical reciprocal discipline in Kentucky.
- What reciprocal discipline should be imposed under SCR 3.435.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (0)
No outbound citations extracted.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…