Summary
The Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed the Court of Appeals' denial of Debra Goff's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking dismissal of an estate-related action in Jefferson Circuit Court. The court held that the circuit court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the adversarial probate-related claims under KRS 395.510 and KRS 395.515. It further held that Goff's statutory-standing argument did not support a writ because an adequate remedy by appeal was available and no great and irreparable injury was shown.
Holdings
- The Jefferson Circuit Court had subject-matter jurisdiction because the Sisters' adversarial claims fit within KRS 395.510 and KRS 395.515, including claims presenting a genuine issue concerning the correct and lawful settlement or distribution of estate assets.
- The asserted question whether the Sisters were authorized by KRS 411.140 to pursue the power-of-attorney misuse claims was a statutory-standing issue, not a subject-matter-jurisdiction issue, and did not support a first-class writ.
- Goff was not entitled to a second-class writ because an adequate remedy by appeal remained available and she did not establish great injustice or irreparable injury.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Jefferson Circuit Court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the Sisters' adversarial action involving the settlement and distribution of the estate.
- Whether the Sisters' asserted lack of statutory standing to pursue claims concerning misuse of the power of attorney justified issuance of a writ of mandamus.
- Whether Goff established the prerequisites for either a first-class or second-class writ.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (22)
- Bender v. Eaton, 343 S.W.2d 799, 800 (Ky. 1961)(followed)
- Goldstein v. Feeley, 299 S.W.3d 549, 551-52 (Ky. 2009)(followed)
- Daugherty v. Telek, 366 S.W.3d 463, 467 (Ky. 2012)(followed)
- Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Trude, 151 S.W.3d 803, 810 (Ky. 2004)(followed)
- Priestley v. Priestley, 949 S.W.2d 594, 598 (Ky. 1997)(followed in result)
- Myers v. State Bank & Trust Co., 307 S.W.2d 933 (Ky. 1957)(considered)
- Maratty v. Pruitt, 334 S.W.3d 107, 112 n.9 (Ky. App. 2011)(followed)
- PNC v. Edwards, 590 S.W.3d 818 (Ky. 2019)(distinguished)
- Karem v. Bryant, 370 S.W.3d 867 (Ky. 2012)(distinguished)
- Privett v. Clendenin, 52 S.W.3d 530 (Ky. 2001)(distinguished)
Showing top 10 of 22.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…