Summary
The Louisiana Supreme Court addresses the burden of proof required to overcome the presumption that property possessed during a marriage is community property under Louisiana Civil Code article 2340. The court holds that the presumption may be rebutted by a preponderance of the evidence, reinstates the classification of certain bank stocks as the wife's separate property, and discusses tracing commingled funds used for certificates of deposit. The court also considers ownership and valuation of a life insurance policy insuring an ex-spouse.
Holdings
- A spouse may rebut the presumption that property possessed during the community regime is community property by proving the property's separate nature by a preponderance of the evidence, not by clear and convincing evidence.
- Bernice Talbot established by a preponderance of the evidence that the bank stocks were her separate property, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting her and her siblings' parol testimony.
- The certificates of deposit were community property because Bernice Talbot did not trace the separate funds through successive rollovers with sufficient certainty.
- Because the life insurance policy was a community asset but Byron Talbot was the policy owner, he retained ownership of the policy and Bernice Talbot was entitled to property equal in value, measured in part by her share of the policy's cash surrender value.
Questions Presented
- What burden of proof must a spouse satisfy to overcome the presumption of community property under Louisiana Civil Code article 2340?
- Whether Bernice Talbot proved by the applicable standard that the Hibernia and Bank One stocks were her separate property.
- Whether Bernice Talbot traced the separate funds sufficiently to establish that the certificates of deposit remained separate property after commingling and rollover of interest.
- Whether a community-owned life insurance policy on an ex-spouse's life should be awarded to the noninsured policy owner or divided through an award of its cash surrender value.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (21)
- Holliday v. Holliday, 358 So. 2d 618, 619 (La. 1978)(followed)
- Succession of Lyons, 452 So. 2d 1161, 1165 (La. 1984)(limited)
- R.D.M. Corp. v. Patterson, 255 La. 301, 230 So. 2d 820 (1970)(distinguished)
- Succession of Hemenway, 228 La. 572, 83 So. 2d 377 (1955)(distinguished)
- Tullier v. Tullier, 464 So. 2d 278, 281-283 (La. 1985)(followed)
- Lasha v. Olin Corp., 625 So. 2d 1002, 1005 (La. 1993)(followed)
- Jordan v. Travelers Ins. Co., 257 La. 995, 245 So. 2d 151, 155 (1971)(followed)
- Prince v. Hopson, 230 La. 575, 89 So. 2d 128, 130-131 (1956)(limited)
- Succession of Broussard, 306 So. 2d 399, 403 (La. App. 3d Cir. 1975)(limited)
- Curtis v. Curtis, 403 So. 2d 56, 58-60 (La. 1981)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 21.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…