Summary
The Louisiana Supreme Court held that a jury's determination of the amount, if any, of damages for lost future earning capacity is a factual finding subject to manifest-error review. Because the jury's zero award was supported by a reasonable factual basis, the court of appeal erred by substituting its judgment and conducting a de novo review. The court reversed the increased award for lost earning capacity and reinstated the jury's zero award, while affirming the judgment in all other respects.
Holdings
- A jury's determination of the amount, if any, of lost earning capacity is an issue of fact subject to the manifest error standard of review.
- The jury's zero award was supported by a reasonable factual basis, and the court of appeal erred by substituting its own credibility determinations for those of the jury.
Questions Presented
- Whether the jury's zero award for loss of future earning capacity was a factual determination subject to manifest-error review.
- Whether the court of appeal properly conducted a de novo review and substituted its own judgment for the jury's determination.
- Whether the jury's zero award was supported by a reasonable factual basis.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- LeBlanc v. Stevenson, 770 So. 2d 766 (La. 2000)(distinguished)
- Mart v. Hill, 505 So. 2d 1120 (La. 1987)(distinguished)
- Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc., 341 So. 2d 332 (La. 1976)(followed)
- Green v. K-Mart, 874 So. 2d 838 (La. 2004)(followed)
- Bonin v. Ferrellgas, 877 So. 2d 89 (La. 2004)(followed)
- Folse v. Fakouri, 371 So. 2d 1120 (La. 1979)(followed)
- Sportsman Store of Lake Charles, Inc. v. Sonitrol Security Systems of Calcasieu, Inc., 748 So. 2d 417 (La. 1999)(followed)
- Lirette v. State Farm Insurance Co., 563 So. 2d 850 (La. 1990)(followed)
- Hobgood v. Aucoin, 574 So. 2d 344 (La. 1990)(followed)
- Reck v. Stevens, 373 So. 2d 498 (La. 1979)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…