Summary
The Louisiana Supreme Court reviews attorney disciplinary charges against Elise M. Beauchamp arising from multiple client matters, including alleged neglect, inadequate communication, failure to refund unearned fees, and failure to cooperate with disciplinary investigations. The court independently evaluates the deemed-admitted factual allegations and determines which Rules of Professional Conduct violations are supported by clear and convincing evidence. The hearing committee and disciplinary board recommended permanent disbarment based on the respondent's repeated misconduct and prior disciplinary history.
Holdings
- When a lawyer fails to answer formal charges, the factual allegations are deemed admitted under Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(E)(3), but legal conclusions and alleged rule violations are not automatically admitted; the court must determine whether the admitted facts establish each violation.
- The record established multiple violations of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct, including failures of diligence and communication, failure to terminate representation properly, failure to expedite litigation, failure to cooperate with disciplinary investigations, dishonesty or misrepresentation, and failure to refund unearned fees under Rule 1.5(f)(5), as specified by matter in the opinion.
- Permanent disbarment was warranted because respondent committed repeated or multiple instances of intentional conversion of client funds causing substantial harm, within Guideline 1 of the permanent-disbarment guidelines.
Questions Presented
- Whether factual allegations in unanswered formal disciplinary charges are deemed admitted under Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 11(E)(3), and whether the resulting legal conclusions or rule violations are likewise admitted.
- Which alleged violations of the Louisiana Rules of Professional Conduct were established by the deemed-admitted facts and the record.
- Whether permanent disbarment was the appropriate sanction for respondent's repeated intentional conversion of client funds and related misconduct.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- In re Beauchamp I, 02-1389 (La. 6/13/02), 821 So. 2d 1281(applied)
- In re Banks, 09-1212 (La. 10/2/09), 18 So. 3d 57(followed)
- In re Donnan, 01-3058 (La. 1/10/03), 838 So. 2d 715(followed)
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis, 513 So. 2d 1173 (La. 1987)(followed)
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington, 459 So. 2d 520 (La. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…