Penny (Leask) Thorne v. Richard S. Leask

861 A.2d 690 (Me. 2004) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · November 30, 2004

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court held that a court may not add a substantive provision to a stipulated divorce judgment without notifying the parties and providing a meaningful opportunity to be heard. The court vacated the judgment requiring the parties to attend a high-conflict co-parenting education course and remanded the matter to the District Court.

Holdings

  1. Before adding a substantive provision to a stipulated divorce judgment to which the parties have not agreed, the court must notify the parties of its intention to add the term and afford them a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a divorce court or Case Management Officer may add a substantive provision requiring participation in a co-parenting education course to a stipulated divorce judgment without first notifying the parties and providing a meaningful opportunity to be heard.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (2)

  • Shaw v. Shaw, 2003 ME 153, ¶ 12 & n. 4, 839 A.2d 714, 717(followed)
  • Cloutier v. Cloutier, 2003 ME 4, ¶¶ 12-14, 814 A.2d 979, 983-84(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…