Desjardins v. Desjardins

876 A.2d 26 (Me. 2005) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · June 23, 2005

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court held that a contempt order setting a payment amount to purge remedial imprisonment did not itself constitute a money judgment. Because no judgment had been entered, the trial court lacked authority to issue a writ of execution for that amount, and the writ order was vacated.

Holdings

  1. A purge amount stated in a remedial contempt order is not automatically a compensatory fine or money judgment. Because the contempt order did not expressly enter a judgment for $7,543.75, no enforceable money judgment existed.
  2. A writ of execution may issue only to enforce a final monetary judgment. Because no judgment for $7,543.75 existed, the District Court lacked authority to issue the writ.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a contempt order that imposed ten days' incarceration and allowed the contemnor to purge by paying a specified amount constituted a money judgment enforceable by writ of execution.
  2. Whether the District Court had authority to issue a writ of execution without an underlying final monetary judgment.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (3)

  • Splude v. Dugan, 2003 ME 88, ¶ 9, 828 A.2d 772, 775-76(followed)
  • Slauenwhite v. Slauenwhite, 679 A.2d 93, 94-95 (Me. 1996)(followed)
  • Gordon v. Bowden, 553 A.2d 665, 666 (Me. 1989)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…