Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court dismissed Daniel R. Bilodeau’s appeal from the denial of his motion to dismiss a child-custody modification proceeding on forum non conveniens grounds. The court held that, absent extraordinary circumstances, such a denial under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act is interlocutory and not immediately appealable.
Holdings
- Absent extraordinary circumstances, the denial of a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens under the UCCJEA is interlocutory rather than a final judgment and is not immediately appealable.
- None of Maine's recognized narrow exceptions to the final judgment rule—the judicial economy, collateral order, or death knell exceptions—applied to this appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the denial of a motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act is a final judgment immediately appealable under Maine's final judgment rule.
- Whether any exception to the final judgment rule permitted immediate appellate review of the denial of Bilodeau's forum non conveniens motion.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- In re Adoption of Matthew R., 2000 ME 86, ¶ 5, 750 A.2d 1262, 1264(followed)
- Barclay v. Eckert, 2000 ME 10, 743 A.2d 1259(followed)
- Duffy v. Reeves, 619 A.2d 1094, 1098 n. 1 (R.I. 1993)(persuasive)
- State v. Me. State Employees Ass'n, 482 A.2d 461, 464 (Me. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…