Johnson v. City of Augusta, 2006 ME 92

902 A.2d 855 (Me. 2006) · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · July 28, 2006

Summary

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court vacated a preliminary injunction ordering Augusta officials to print initiative petitions. The court held that the dispute was not ripe because the Augusta City Council had not yet acted on the applications, and the delay did not establish sufficient hardship. The court did not reach the merits of the challenge to the city charter.

Holdings

  1. The dispute was not ripe because the city council had not yet decided whether to grant or deny the applications, and the record did not establish an unreasonable delay or a sufficient concrete hardship to Johnson.
  2. The Superior Court's preliminary injunction was premature because there was no completed governmental action for the court to review.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Johnson's challenge to the Augusta City Charter and the council's failure to issue initiative petitions was ripe for judicial review before the city council had acted on the applications.
  2. Whether the Superior Court prematurely issued a preliminary injunction requiring the city clerk to print and issue the petitions.

Disposition

vacated

Cases Cited (6)

  • Waterville Indus., Inc. v. Fin. Auth. of Me., 2000 ME 138, ¶ 22, 758 A.2d 986, 992(followed)
  • Me. AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Ins., 1998 ME 257, ¶¶ 7-9, 721 A.2d 633, 635-36(followed)
  • Me. Pub. Serv. Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 490 A.2d 1218, 1221 (Me. 1985)(followed)
  • Nat'l Park Hospitality Ass'n v. Dep't of the Interior, 538 U.S. 803, 808-09, 123 S. Ct. 2026, 155 L. Ed. 2d 1017 (2003)(followed)
  • Abbott Labs. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 149, 87 S. Ct. 1507, 18 L. Ed. 2d 681 (1967)(followed)
  • Bar Harbor Banking & Trust Co. v. Alexander, 411 A.2d 74, 77-78 (Me. 1980)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…