Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court considered whether the Town of Eddington’s enforcement action against the University of Maine Foundation for violating subdivision approval conditions was barred by Maine’s six-year general statute of limitations. The court held that the twenty-year limitations provision in the subdivision statute, 30-A M.R.S. § 4402(5), governed the action, vacated the dismissal, and remanded for further proceedings.
Holdings
- The twenty-year limitations provision in 30-A M.R.S. § 4402(5) governs the Town's action to enforce alleged violations of the state subdivision law, subdivision approval conditions, and municipal subdivision ordinances; the general six-year limitations period in 14 M.R.S. § 752 does not limit the action.
- The Superior Court erred in dismissing the Town's complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the six-year statute of limitations.
Questions Presented
- Whether 14 M.R.S. § 752, the general six-year statute of limitations for civil actions, barred the Town's enforcement action against an allegedly noncompliant subdivision.
- Whether 30-A M.R.S. § 4402(5), as part of the integrated state subdivision law, established a twenty-year limitations period applicable to enforcement actions involving violations of subdivision approvals and municipal subdivision ordinances.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (2)
- Heber v. Lucerne-in-Me. Vill. Corp., 2000 ME 137, ¶ 7, 755 A.2d 1064, 1066(followed)
- Gorham Sav. Bank v. Balzley, 1998 ME 9, ¶ 7, 704 A.2d 398, 401(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…