Summary
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed a Superior Court judgment declaring William Tardif's UCC financing statement against bank officials unauthorized and ordering its removal from the UCC index. The court held that Tardif could not unilaterally create a default judgment, that the bank officials were protected from liability for complying with a child-support withholding order, and that Tardif lacked authority to file the financing statement. The court also imposed $500 in costs for a frivolous appeal.
Holdings
- Tardif's UCC financing statement was unauthorized and ineffective because he lacked authority under 11 M.R.S. §§ 9-1509 or 9-1708 to file it.
- The bank officials were discharged by statute from liability to Tardif for money turned over to the Department in compliance with the withholding order.
- The appeal was frivolous because Tardif could not reasonably have expected to prevail on a meritless challenge to the unauthorized filing, and the court awarded $500 in costs under M.R. App. P. 13(f).
Questions Presented
- Whether Tardif's UCC financing statement against the bank's chief executive officer and attorney was an authorized filing under Maine law.
- Whether the bank officials were statutorily discharged from liability for complying with the Department's order to withhold and deliver Tardif's funds.
- Whether the appeal was frivolous and warranted an award of appellate costs under M.R. App. P. 13(f).
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Tardif v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., Mem 09-9 (Jan. 20, 2009)(followed as procedural background)
- Edwards v. Campbell, 2008 ME 173, ¶ 11, 960 A.2d 324, 327(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…